Compare features

UnieWMS vs Körber WMS (HighJump)

Enterprise WMS ($100K+) vs Mid-market WMS with revenue model

Körber (formerly HighJump) charges hundreds of thousands for licenses/services for bigger sites ($100K+ implementation, $50K+/year SaaS). UnieWMS offers flat $500/month with FREE WMS at 42 clients—orders of magnitude cheaper.

Körber was known for extreme flexibility via HighJump App Studio allowing deep customization. UnieWMS chooses convention over configuration—provides refined best-practice workflows for faster deployment and easier maintenance.

Ready to Achieve FREE WMS?

Start saving thousands per month and transform your WMS into a revenue stream. Get started with optional implementation fees (large facilities will need them; some want them too) and see results in ~14 days.

See It Live - Book Demo

No credit card required • Optional implementation fees • FREE WMS at 42 clients

Pricing model

Körber: Enterprise pricing—$100K+ implementation and $50K+/year SaaS for medium 3PL warehouse (hypothetical). Historically HighJump targeted tier-1 and tier-2 warehouses, often slightly cheaper than Manhattan/JDA but still hundreds of thousands range. Even lighter product variants start in low tens of thousands.
UnieWMS: Flat $500/month ($6K/year). First 20 client accounts included. Additional clients cost $17/month. Sell white-label at $29/month = $12/client/month profit. FREE WMS at 42 clients. Entire cost for decades wouldn't reach Körber's first-year expense.

Onboarding speed

Körber: HighJump implementations ranged from few months for simpler to 6+ months for larger or heavily customized. Often bought specifically to customize, which extends timelines. If kept mostly vanilla, might get running in 3-4 months.
UnieWMS: ~30 days average deployment with white-glove onboarding. AI-powered data migration. Even if slight feature tweak needed, vendor might add it or find workaround faster than designing custom workflow in HighJump. Speed to value clearly favors UnieWMS for typical mid-market needs.

Integrations

Körber: Can integrate with wide range of systems. HighJump's strength was tools for integration and open database interfaceable through APIs or EDI. Doesn't come with ready-made connectors for Shopify, etc., but partner or in-house IT can build them with toolset.
UnieWMS: Pre-built marketplace connectors for common platforms. White-labeled client dashboard connects all client marketplaces. Open APIs/webhooks for custom needs. Can set up new integrations in ~3 days. Advantage is having connectors pre-built and quick to deploy.

Execution & UX

Körber: HighJump was known for extreme flexibility—had unique configuration tool (HighJump App Studio) that let implementers tailor workflows and screens easily. This means it can adapt to many business models, including 3PL operations with custom requirements. Supports all core WMS features (multi-client inventory, advanced picking methodologies, automation equipment integration, etc.). Many 3PLs have used HighJump in past, often praising adaptability, but that can also make it complex to maintain if over-customized. Can do things like embedded warehouse workflow scripts or tailoring mobile app to specific prompts. Had modules for 3PL billing, and many 3PLs leveraged it. If Körber still offers 3PL billing module, that's feature UnieWMS would have to handle via integration currently. Can integrate with automation (conveyors, carousels, etc.) and supports advanced workflow automation configured in system. If 3PL had specific automation equipment or complex picking rules, HighJump could handle that through configuration or custom code. Differentiator was extreme flexibility—if you want WMS you can mold deeply to unique process, Körber might suit (but it'll cost time/money).
UnieWMS: Chooses convention over configuration—provides refined set of best-practice workflows rather than infinite customizability. For mid-market 3PL, this is often positive (less risk of mis-configuring or requiring heavy IT support). Feature-wise, probably doesn't allow deep UI/script customization by user—it's standardized to what works best generally (though vendor can update things). Includes integrations and presumably will integrate with billing or eventually have built-in one—but right now, advantage to Körber for having established billing solution if so. More targeted at human-centered automation (smart assignments, etc.) and integrates with standard devices (scanners, label printers). If 3PL down line invests in robotics, UnieWMS would likely need to build integration (which they could, given their agility). Differentiator is simplicity—you likely won't need to add fields or screens because they aimed to include everything needed out-of-box. If you prefer lean solution that embodies best practices, UnieWMS suits. For mid-market 3PL, likely delivers 95% of what they need at fraction of effort and cost, making fancy extras of Körber not worth investment.

Support

Körber: HighJump did support multi-client warehouses well and had ability to segregate data by client and even produce client-specific reports and invoices. However, like others, didn't come with polished web portal for clients by default (some 3PLs might have given read-only logins for clients to check inventory in HighJump's Web UI, but that's pretty rough for non-trained user). Usually, 3PLs would extract data to share with clients. Since HighJump was flexible, some 3PLs possibly built extension or used its web services to create basic client info portal. HighJump's flexibility means if you needed specific field to capture client-specific info, you could add it easily. For client service, would rely on manager's vigilance to ensure tasks are done on time. Support available but customization burden lies on user. Often requires HighJump professional services or certified developers. App Studio allowed creating new workflows, fields, etc. through UI—this requires training but was differentiator (you could say 'table stakes vs. differentiators'—HighJump's differentiator was extreme flexibility).
UnieWMS: Currently also similar (no dedicated portal, but data can be shared). Could allow something similar via API. Given both can achieve it with effort, neither has out-of-box client UI advantage. With UnieWMS, you might request feature (which they might add for all customers if useful). For client service, real differentiator is UnieWMS's proactive monitoring—it helps you prevent SLA misses (critical to keeping clients happy) by highlighting at-risk tasks. So UnieWMS indirectly improves client satisfaction by making 3PL more reliable. Priority support and onboarding included. AI customer support. 4.9/5 CSAT. Continuous updates. Vendor handles most enhancements. Differentiator is simplicity—won't need to add fields or screens because aimed to include everything needed out-of-box. Vendor can update things. More likely to adapt to mid-market 3PL needs vs Körber's flexibility burden lying on user.

FeatureUnieWMSCompetitor

Pricing model$500/month flat (FREE at 42 clients)Per-site license or SaaS subscription (quote-based, high side)

Product brandingN/A (single product)Formerly HighJump, now rebranded as Körber (HighJump Warehouse Advantage)

Target market (historical)Mid-market 3PLsHistorically HighJump targeted tier-1 and tier-2 warehouses

Pricing range (historical)$500/month (same for all)Often slightly cheaper than Manhattan/JDA but still hundreds of thousands range

Medium 3PL warehouse cost$500/month ($6K/year)$100K implementation + $50K/year SaaS (hypothetical)

SMB variant cost$500/month (no tiers)Lighter product variants start in low tens of thousands (Discrete WMS from former Accellos aimed at SMB)

Cost comparisonExtremely cost-competitive for functionality offeredWould generally be much more expensive for equivalent user counts (probably order of magnitude more for mid-size warehouse)

Implementation costOptional (large facilities will need them; some want them too; white-glove onboarding included)$100K+ for medium warehouse (hundreds of thousands for bigger sites)

Total cost (3 years)$18K (FREE at 42 clients)$250K+ (medium warehouse hypothetical)

Revenue opportunityEarn $12/client/month profitNo revenue—pure cost center

Product philosophyConvention over configuration (refined best-practice workflows)Extreme flexibility (known for adaptability via App Studio)

Customization toolBest practices built-in (standardized)Unique configuration tool (HighJump App Studio) that let implementers tailor workflows and screens easily

Customization approachProvides refined set of best-practice workflows rather than infinite customizabilityCustomers can heavily modify system (App Studio allowed creating new workflows, fields, etc. through UI)

Customization burdenVendor handles updates and enhancementsCustomization burden lies on user (requires training but was differentiator)

UI/script customizationProbably doesn't allow deep UI/script customization by user (standardized)Can do things like embedded warehouse workflow scripts or tailoring mobile app to specific prompts

Field customizationMight request feature (vendor might add for all customers if useful)If you needed specific field to capture client-specific info, you could add it easily

Flexibility philosophyDifferentiator is simplicity—you likely won't need to add fields/screensDifferentiator was extreme flexibility—if you want WMS you can mold deeply to unique process, Körber might suit (but it'll cost time/money)

Maintenance complexityLess risk of mis-configuring or requiring heavy IT supportCan make it complex to maintain if over-customized

3PL capabilitiesPurpose-built for 3PL operationsCan adapt to many business models, including 3PL operations with custom requirements

3PL historyBuilt for 3PL from startMany 3PLs have used HighJump in past, often praising adaptability

3PL billing moduleWould have to handle via integration currently (presumably will integrate or eventually have built-in)Had modules for 3PL billing, and many 3PLs leveraged it (if Körber still offers, that's advantage—but adds to complexity and cost)

Billing module costIncluded (via integration or future built-in)Might license separately (adds to complexity and cost)

Core WMS featuresReceiving through shipping with strong functionalitySupports all core WMS features (multi-client inventory, advanced picking methodologies, automation equipment integration)

Automation integrationMore targeted at human-centered automation (smart assignments, standard devices)Can integrate with automation (conveyors, carousels, etc.) and supports advanced workflow automation configured in system

Automation equipment handlingIf 3PL invests in robotics, would likely need to build integration (which they could, given their agility)If 3PL had specific automation equipment or complex picking rules, HighJump could handle that through configuration or custom code

Robotics integrationCould build integration (vendor agile)Might already have module or experience integrating with that type of equipment

Analytics approachIncludes real-time dashboards and metrics as core part of using systemProvides variety of reports but not sure if have real-time dashboard in base product

Real-time dashboardsReal-time dashboards included (out-of-box operational insight)Many HighJump users would export data to BI tool for fancy dashboards

Analytics differentiatorOut-of-box operational insight (differentiator)Differentiator was letting you tailor reports exactly, but you have to do that

AI capabilitiesUses rule-based 'AI-like' behavior to auto-prioritize tasksDoesn't explicitly have AI in WMS yet (though they have voice and maybe some machine learning in slotting or labor planning perhaps)

Proactive monitoringProactive monitoring helps prevent SLA misses by highlighting at-risk tasks (critical to keeping clients happy)Would rely on manager's vigilance to ensure tasks are done on time

Client satisfactionIndirectly improves client satisfaction by making 3PL more reliableRelies on manager vigilance for client service

E-commerce integrationsPre-built marketplace connectors (Amazon, Shopify, etc.)Doesn't come with ready-made connectors for Shopify, etc.

Integration approachPre-built connectors and quick to deploy for common platformsCan integrate with wide range of systems (tools for integration and open database)

Integration methodDirect marketplace connections (~3 days setup)Interfaceable through APIs or EDI

Integration complexityAdvantage is having connectors pre-built and quick to deployPartner or in-house IT can build them fairly straightforwardly with toolset

Extensibility approachOpen APIs and working closely with customers for enhancementsHighJump's strength was tools for integration and open database

Extensibility burdenVendor handles most enhancements as part of serviceCustomer can heavily modify system (but burden lies on user)

Implementation timeline (vanilla)~30 days average (right-sized solution)If kept mostly vanilla, might get running in 3-4 months

Implementation timeline (simple)~30 days (same regardless)Few months for simpler implementations

Implementation timeline (customized)~30 days (vendor might add feature or find workaround quickly)6+ months for larger or heavily customized (often bought specifically to customize, which extends timelines)

Speed to valueSpeed to value clearly favors UnieWMS for typical mid-market needsTimeline depends on customization level

Feature tweak speedEven if slight feature tweak needed, vendor might add it or find workaround faster than designing custom workflowDesigning custom workflow in HighJump takes time

Client portalCurrently similar (no dedicated portal, but data can be shared, could allow via API)Did support multi-client warehouses well and had ability to segregate data by client

Client portal UICould allow something similar via APIDidn't come with polished web portal for clients by default (some might have given read-only logins in Web UI, but rough for non-trained user)

Client portal developmentCould allow via API (given both can achieve it with effort)Some 3PLs possibly built extension or used web services to create basic client info portal

Client reports/invoicesData available for client reportingHad ability to produce client-specific reports and invoices

Client UI advantageNeither has out-of-box client UI advantageNeither has out-of-box client UI advantage (both can achieve with effort)

Update approachContinuous updates (vendor handles)Customizations may complicate upgrades

Support qualityPriority support included, vendor handles enhancementsSupport available but customization burden lies on user

Professional servicesWhite-glove onboarding includedOften requires HighJump professional services or certified developers

Suitability (mid-market)Likely delivers 95% of what they need at fraction of effort and costFor mid-market 3PL, fancy extras not worth investment

ROI comparisonMaking fancy extras of Körber not worth investmentUnieWMS likely delivers 95% at fraction of effort and cost

Solution philosophyIf you prefer lean solution that embodies best practices, UnieWMS suitsIf you want WMS you can mold deeply to unique process, Körber might suit (but it'll cost time/money)

The Numbers Don't Lie - Start Saving Today

Every month you wait is money lost. Get FREE WMS at 42 clients while competitors charge thousands. No risk—optional implementation fees (large facilities will need them; some want them too) so you can start with clarity.

Calculate Your Savings - Talk to Sales

Ideal for

Mid-market 3PLs seeking 95%+ cost savings ($18K over 3 years vs $250K+) with FREE WMS potential at 42 clients vs Körber's $100K+ implementation and $50K+/year SaaS for medium warehouse.
Operations wanting 5-10x faster deployment (~30 days vs 3-4 months vanilla or 6+ months heavily customized) where speed to value clearly favors UnieWMS for typical mid-market needs.
Warehouses preferring simpler maintenance (best practices built-in, vendor handles updates) vs extreme flexibility requiring ongoing customization work that can become complex to maintain if over-customized.
3PLs needing out-of-box operational insight (real-time dashboards included as core part) vs HighJump requiring export to BI tool for dashboards where you have to tailor reports exactly yourself.
Operations prioritizing proactive SLA management (proactive monitoring highlights at-risk tasks, improves client satisfaction) vs HighJump relying on manager's vigilance to ensure tasks are done on time.
Teams seeking pre-built marketplace integrations (connectors quick to deploy in ~3 days) vs Körber requiring partner or in-house IT to build connectors with toolset.
Warehouses wanting convention over configuration (refined best-practice workflows, less mis-configuring risk) vs extreme flexibility via App Studio that costs time/money and can make maintenance complex.
3PLs preferring vendor-handled enhancements (vendor can update things, includes everything needed out-of-box) vs App Studio allowing customization but burden lies on user requiring training and ongoing work.
Operations needing 95% of functionality at fraction of cost (lean solution embodying best practices) vs Körber's extreme customization capabilities that may not be worth investment for mid-market needs.
Teams seeking revenue opportunity through white-label revenue model ($12/client/month at 42 clients) vs Körber's ongoing enterprise fees with no revenue opportunity (pure cost center).

Outcomes you get

95%+ cost savings: $18K over 3 years vs $250K+ (medium warehouse: $100K implementation + $50K/year). Even SMB variant starting in low tens of thousands vs UnieWMS $500/month. Extremely cost-competitive for functionality offered. FREE WMS at 42 clients vs Körber's ongoing enterprise fees.
5-10x faster deployment: ~30 days vs 3-4 months (vanilla) or 6+ months (heavily customized). Speed to value clearly favors UnieWMS for typical mid-market needs. Even if slight feature tweak needed, vendor might add it or find workaround faster than designing custom workflow in HighJump.
Simpler maintenance and updates: Best practices built-in with vendor handling updates vs extreme flexibility requiring ongoing customization work that can make it complex to maintain if over-customized. Customizations may complicate upgrades on Körber side.
Out-of-box operational insight: Real-time dashboards and metrics included as core part vs HighJump requiring export to BI tool for dashboards. Out-of-box operational insight differentiator vs letting you tailor reports exactly (but you have to do that).
Proactive SLA management: Proactive monitoring helps prevent SLA misses by highlighting at-risk tasks (critical to keeping clients happy, indirectly improves client satisfaction) vs HighJump relying on manager's vigilance to ensure tasks are done on time.
Pre-built marketplace integrations: Connectors pre-built and quick to deploy for common platforms vs requiring partner or in-house IT to build connectors with toolset. Can set up in ~3 days vs building custom integrations.
Convention over configuration: Refined best-practice workflows (less risk of mis-configuring, doesn't require heavy IT support) vs extreme flexibility via App Studio that can make it complex to maintain if over-customized. Differentiator is simplicity vs extreme flexibility.
Vendor-handled enhancements: Won't need to add fields or screens because aimed to include everything needed out-of-box (vendor can update things) vs App Studio allowing creating new workflows/fields through UI but customization burden lies on user.
95% of functionality at fraction of cost: For mid-market 3PL, likely delivers 95% of what they need at fraction of effort and cost, making fancy extras of Körber not worth investment. Lean solution that embodies best practices vs WMS you can mold deeply (but costs time/money).
Revenue opportunity: Transform cost center to profit center with white-label revenue ($12/client/month at 42 clients) vs Körber's ongoing enterprise fees with no revenue opportunity (pure cost center).

Stop Paying for WMS. Start Earning from It.

Transform your biggest expense into your biggest revenue opportunity. Get FREE WMS at 42 clients and turn every client into $12/month profit.

Implementation Fee

~14 Days

To Go Live

42 Clients

For FREE WMS

See Live Demo

⚡ Start in minutes • 💰 FREE WMS at 42 clients • 🚀 No credit card required

← Back to comparisons Talk to sales Book a demo